- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34768 WP No. 17210 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.17210 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MOHANDHATA S/O LATE MARANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT THIPPAGANHALLI VILLAGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572141. 2. SRI. NARASHIMHA MURTHY T.M. S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT THIPPAGANHALLI VILLAGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572141. 3. SRI. SHANTHARAJU T.H. S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A THIPPAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572141. 4. SRI.THIPPESWAMY T.N. S/O LATE NARASHIMHAPPA, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34768 WP No. 17210 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT THIPPAGANHALLI VILALGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ROHITH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ADINARAYANA M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNTAKA BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKURU - 562159. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MADHUGIRI SUB DIVISION TUMKURU DISTRICT-562159. 4. NARAYANAPPA SINCE DEAD BY LRS. SMT. NAGAMANI, W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT THIPPAGANHALLI VILLAGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572141. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34768 WP No. 17210 of 2026 5. SRI. T.N.JAGADEESH, S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT THIPPAGANHALLI VILLAGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572141. 6. SRI. MOHAN KUMAR, S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT THIPPAGANHALLI VILLAGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572141. 7. SRI. THIPPESWAMY T.N. S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT THIPPAGANHALLI VILLAGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572141. 8. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK-572141. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 AND R8) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET SIDE OR QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY 2ND RESPONDENT IN R.P.51/2025 DATED 10-11-2022 AND THE - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34768 WP No. 17210 of 2026 ORDER PASSED BY 3RD RESPONDENT IN R.R.T.NO.(A)(PA) 11/2024 DATED 20.12.2024 IN RESPECT OF LAND IN SY.NO. 35 NOW NEW SY.NO.PHODED AS 35/1 AND 35/2 MEASURING 10 ACERS 17 GUNTAS, SITAUED AT THIPPAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B AND ALLOW THE R.R.T.NO.(A)(PA) 11/2024 ON THE FILE 3RD RESPONDENT; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In the present writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the order dated 10.11.2022 passed by the respondent No.2 and order dated 20.12.2024 passed by respondent No.3 (Annexures-A and B). 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Upon consideration of the material on record, it is evident that the respondent-authorities - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34768 WP No. 17210 of 2026 have effected the mutation entries in respect of the land in question pursuant to the judgment and decree passed by the competent Civil Court in O.S. No.91/1982. The mutation entries have been made in conformity with the said judgment and decree by following the procedure contemplated under Section 128 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 4. In that view of the matter, I am of the considered opinion that no illegality or infirmity can be attributed to the impugned orders. The respondent- authorities have merely given effect to the judgment and decree of the competent Civil Court, and therefore, the grounds urged in the writ petition do not call for interference by this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34768 WP No. 17210 of 2026 5. It is made clear that if the petitioners are aggrieved by the judgment and decree p'] ''assed in O.S. No.91/1982, it is open to the petitioners to work out their remedies before the competent Court in accordance with law. All contentions in that regard are left open. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21