Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27979 (CHH)

SANTOSH KUMAR AGRAWAL v. SANJAY KUMAR

WP227/843/2025 · 2026-07-21

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010361272025 2026:CGHC:31365 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 843 of 2025 Santosh Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Gourishankar Agrawal, Aged About 55 Years R/o 154, Agroha Marg, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Sanjay Kumar S/o Late Gourishankar Agrawal, Aged About 48 Years R/o Laxman Ban Talab Road, Behind Police Station- Kotwali, Korba, Tahsil And District Korba (C.G.) 2 - Kalpana Garg, W/o Rajendra Garg, Aged About 50 Years R/o Anand Gudakhu Factory, Goshala Road, Kharsia, Tahsil- Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Vivek Singhania, S/o L.P. Singhania, Aged About 39 Years R/o Gandhi Chowk, Newra (Tilda), District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Vinita Agrawal, W/o Ashish Agrawal, Aged About 36 Years R/o Motis 9 And 9, Kharora Road, Near Jain Mandir, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Korba, District Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anu Mishra, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Richa Sahu, P.L. for the State SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 22/07/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by the afflux of time, the present writ petition has become infructuous, and therefore, she does not want to press the same. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit