Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27976 (JHR)

RAJU KUMAR SAW @ RAJA KUMAR @ RAJU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9333/2026 · 2026-10-06

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:29938 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9333 of 2026 Raju Kumar Saw @ Raja Kumar @ Raju Kumar, aged about 28 years, son of Munna Saw, resident of Near Barmasia Middle School, P.O. & P.S. – Dhanbad, District – Dhanbad, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Lily Sahay, APP --- 03/06.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2026 in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.183/2026, registered under Sections 126 (2), 127 (2), 115 (2), 64 (1), 351 (3) and 3 (5) of the BNS 2023 now pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The victim is a married lady and she married one Suraj Kumar and also became pregnant and she moved from one place to another and she was found isolated, and therefore, the petitioner brought her so that she could work as a domestic help. He submits that the petitioner is the resident of the locality and he has been wrongly apprehended. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. She has submitted that it is alleged that rape was committed upon the informant, who happens to be the victim and she managed to escape from the apartment while she was half dressed and raised alarm. The people of the locality apprehended the petitioner on the spot. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the direct allegation against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Hence, this 2026:JHHC:29938 2 bail application is rejected. 6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:06.10.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:08.10.2026