Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27976 (AP)

G.Savitri v. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation

WP/27662/2013 · 2026-03-10

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010715752013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 27662/2013 Between: 1. G.SAVITRI,, W/O. LATE G. APPALASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. 44-36-10/B, SRINIVASA NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: 1. ASC BOSE (SC FOR GVMC) The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri S. Bhargav, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri P. Durga Prasad, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent. 2. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to declare the action of the Respondent in dispossessing the Petitioner by demolishing the compound wall. 3. Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Deputy City Planner, GVMC dated 11.03.2026 along with a copy of the Transferable Development Right Certificate (TDR) dated 26.02.2013 bearing Rc.No.18652/2011/ACP-I. Copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 4. The Written Instructions as well as the copy of the TDR Certificate dated 26.02.2013 would disclose that during the pendency of the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner herein has received the TDR bond. 5. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, confirms this position. 6. Having so recorded, this Court is of the opinion that no further consideration is necessary. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:11.03.2026 Vns