Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2797 (RAJ)

ROJHADI DUGDH UTPADAK SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WMAP/424/2025 · 2026-02-27

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9192] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 424/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4673/2025 Rojhadi Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Samiti Limited, Having Its Registered Office At Rojhadi Purana Gaon, Engineering College, Kota, Rajasthan-344010, Through Its Chairman Namely Mahaveer S/o Bajrang Lal, R/o Rojhadi Purana Gaon, Engineering College, Kota, (Raj).- 344010. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through its Secretary, Local Self Bodies, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan State Co-Operative Dairy Federation, RCDF, Through Its Managing Director, Saras Sankul, Jln, Jaipur. 3. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nehru Sehkar Bhawan, Sehkar Circle, Jaipur. 4. Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Kota to be Served through Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nehru Sehkar Bhawan, Sehkar Circle, Jaipur. 5. Kota Bundi Zila Dughdh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nakul Bansal for Mr. Kamlesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 27/02/2026 1. Instant civil misc. application dated 17.09.2025 has been filed seeking to recall the final order dated 02.04.2025, dismissing S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4673/2025. [2026:RJ-JP:9192] (2 of 2) [WMAP-424/2025] 2. The submission of counsel for applicant/ writ petitioner is that due to cancellation of registration of petitioner- Samiti, the appeal pending before the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, has become infructuous and therefore, it is imperative for the petitioner to seek restoration of his registration and than to pursue its appeal before the Tribunal. 3. Surprisingly, no order-sheet or other material have been produced by the applicant/writ petitioner to substantiate the contention, hence, in absence of same, there is no reason to recall the order dated 02.04.2025. 4. Accordingly, application is hereby dismissed. 5. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /6