[129] Parmod Kumar State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of issue raised by the petitioner vide Annexures P [2] authorities are the concerned Tehsildar has demarcation and submit the said report, [3] for the petitioner. [4] present writ petition. [5] disposed off 09.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11792 Date of Decision : Parmod Kumar versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Mohit Kumar Gujjar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 to look into the issue raised by the petitioner vide Annexures P Learned State Counsel, on instructions, submits that the authorities are awaiting the demarcation concerned Tehsildar has already demarcation and submit his report before 13.07.2026 said report, necessary action will be taken. Statement made by learned State Counsel satisfies counsel for the petitioner. In view thereof, no order present writ petition. According, the sa All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. 09.07.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 11792-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 09.07.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner seeks a writ in the directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 to look into the issue raised by the petitioner vide Annexures P-1 & P-2. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, submits that the demarcation report. He further submits that already been directed to conduct report before 13.07.2026. Upon receipt of necessary action will be taken. Statement made by learned State Counsel satisfies counsel is required to be passed in the he same is disposed off. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner seeks a writ in the directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 to look into the Learned State Counsel, on instructions, submits that the He further submits that been directed to conduct the receipt of Statement made by learned State Counsel satisfies counsel s required to be passed in the All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.10 17:10 I agree to specified portions of this document