IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49746 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2026 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1. Lalbabu Yadav S/O Ramprasad Yadav R/O Rampurwa, P.S- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran. 2. Beyas Yadav @ Byas Yadav S/O Vidya Sagar Yadav R/O Rampurwa, P.S- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 28-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2)(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1) and 352 of the B.N.S. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no.1 is a person with clean antecedent and is an Army-man and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that on 10.05.2026, sixteen named accused persons including the petitioners came with an intent to grab his land, but the attempt was resisted when Vipin assaulted him by Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49746 of 2026(2) dt.28-07-2026 2/3 knife causing injury on back. Further, Kuldeep and Lal Saheb assaulted Ramayan by iron rod injuring him, thereafter Lalu ran over the tractor on his son Birendra causing injury. Further, Beyas Yadav assaulted Jalebi Devi by lathi injuring her and accused also assaulted Budhan and Antima Devi. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to land. It is further submitted that petitioner no.2 earlier came to be implicated in one case which was instituted from the side of the informant. It is further submitted that though it is alleged that Vipin assaulted the informant by knife causing injury on back, but then, the injury has been opined to be simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance which belies the allegation of assault by knife. It is further submitted that allegation of assault against the petitioner no.1 is also not specific and as far as petitioner no.2 is concerned, he has been implicated with an allegation that he assaulted Jalebi Devi by lathi, but then the FIR does not disclose where injury was caused. It is also submitted that if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove their innocence. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49746 of 2026(2) dt.28-07-2026 3/3 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Yogapatti P. S. Case No.159 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 7. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T