Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27958 (AP)

ANISETTY HEMA SHANKAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/122/2026 · 2026-01-05

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010717642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 122/2026 Between: Anisetty Hema Shankar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PENUMAKA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.122 of 2026 O R DE R: 1. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No.1 in not taking action on the Petitioner’s representation dated 06.12.2025 for grant of promotion as Chief Executive Officer of the Respondent No.8 Society as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Initially, the Petitioner joined in the Respondent Society as Staff Assistant on daily wage basis on 06.11.2017. Pursuant to the retirement of the erstwhile Chief Executive Officer/Secretary, the Petitioner was placed in-charge Secretary/Chief Executive Officer of the Respondent No.8 Society and he continued as such till 05.12.2025. Thereafter, the Petitioner submitted a representation dated 06.12.2025 to appoint him as Chief Executive Officer of Respondent No.8 Society. As the same was being not considered, the present Writ Petition is filed. 3. Sri B. Srinivasarao, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent No. 7, submits that the District Level Empower Committee will make the recommendations and the Society adheres to the same as per the procedure in vogue as on date. 3 He further submits that the case of the petitioner would be examined by the said committee and an appropriate recommendation can be made, provided the Petitioner submits representation. 4. Heard the respective counsel. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions: i) The Petitioner shall submit a representation to the Respondent No. 7 within a period of two weeks. ii) On receipt of the representation from the Petitioner, the Respondent No. 7 shall forward the same to the District Level Empower Committee for examining the case of Petitioner for appointment as Chief Executive Officer within a period of (03) months therefrom. iii) There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. _________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 06.01.2026 eha 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO:122/2026 Dt. 06.01.2026 eha