Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27956 (AP)

Kurangi Srinivasulu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/36698/2025 · 2026-01-05

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010717912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 36698/2025 Between: 1. KURANGI SRINIVASULU, S/O MASTANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO.2-212, KURICHEDU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT (AADHAR NO.432987380272) ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. - 522237 2. THE DIRECTOR, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522502 3. THE DARSI MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER DARSI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. - 523247 4. KOTA CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O VENKATA SUBBAYYA, AGED MAJOR, R/O ADDANKI ROAD, DARSI VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523247, CELL.9866807945 5. VADLAMUDI VIJAYAKUMARI, W/O GURU BRAHMMAM, AGED MAJOR, ,R/P,PODILI ROAD, DARSI VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523247 6. KOTA VENKATA VEERA NARAYANAMMA, D/O LATE VENKATA SUBBAYYA, AGED MAJOR, R/O ADDANKI ROAD, DARSI VILLAGE AND MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT-52324 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, to declare the action of the Respondents No.1 to 3 in not considering nor initiating any action pursuant to the representation made by the petitioner dt.19- 12-2025 to curtail/stop the ongoing unauthorized construction in the petitioner's property situated in Sy.No.788/1, vide Patta No.634, situated in Darsi Municipality, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District by the Respondents No.4 to 6, as contrary to the provisions of the Municipalities Act, consequently direct the Respondents No.1 to 3 herein to curtail/stop the unauthorized ongoing construction by the Respondents No.4 to 6, on the said property, pending consideration of the representation dt. 19-12-2025 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.1 to 3 herein to curtail/stop the unauthorized ongoing construction by the Respondents No.4 to 6, on the petitioner’s property situated in Sy.No.788/1 vide Patta No.634, situated in Darsi Municipality, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District, pending consideration of the representation dt. 19-12-2025, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ALLAPARTHI CHINMAI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M A S NARASIMHA RAO 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 3 Order: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 06.01.2026 PNS