R. Nagendra Prasad, S/o Late R. Subbanna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Secretary
WP/18598/2014 · 2026-03-30
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27949 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27949 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010718142014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 18598/2014 Between:
1. R. NAGENDRA PRASAD, S/O LATE R. SUBBANNA,, OCC: RETD. EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.28/2/255, NAVODAYA COLONY, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DIST,AP. 2. R. SUBRAMANYAM, S/O LATE R. SUBBANNA,, OCC: JUNIOR ASSISTANT, FAMILY COURT, AT ANANTAPUR. RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.28/2/255, NAVODAYA COLONY, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DIST,AP. 3. R. RAMASUBAIAH, S/O LATE R. SUBBANNA,, OCC: BUSINESS RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.28/2/255, NAVODAYA COLONY, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DIST,AP. 4. R. NAGARAJU, S/O LATE R. SUBBANNA,, OCC: DRIVER OF APSRTC. RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.28/2/255, NAVODAYA COLONY, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DIST,AP. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF A.P. SECRETARIAT, AT HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ANANTAPURAM ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT, -
2
3. THE ANANTAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature MANDAMUS of declaring the action of the respondents in taking possession of land admeasuring Ac.0.66 cents out of Ac.1.07 cents in Sy.No.301 of Anantapuram town illegally and continuing with their illegal possession and the deliberate failure on the part of the respondents to comply with the order dated 07-03-2006 passed in W.P.No.10071/99 directing the respondents to allot alternate site or pay adequate compensation under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as illegal, arbitrary, without authority of law, violative of Article 14 and Article 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to initiate land acquisition proceedings forthwith and also pay compensation for use of the land from 1996 onwards with interest at the rate of 12% p.a. in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 23323 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to change the nature of land by laying the road in the land admeasuring Ac.0.66cents out of Ac.1.07cents in Sy.No.301 of Anantapuram town, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.
M V SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In
2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
3. T BHEEMANNA(S C FOR MUN CORP ATP)
3
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri K. Ranga Srinivas, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M.V. Subba Reddy, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri P. Vengala Reddy, Ld. Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporations. 2. Sri P. Vengala Reddy, Ld. Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporations has submitted the Written Instructions dated 31.03.2026 furnished by the Town Planning Officer, Municipal Corporation, Ananthapuramu along with the photocopy of the Affidavit and the four photocopies of Banker Cheques dated 06.07.2018 and 17.05.2018 totaling to Rs.1,30,00,000/-. Copies of it are supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Writ Petitioners herein have received the due compensation and no further consideration is necessary. 4. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr
4
173
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 18598 OF 2014
Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr