APHC010712362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 36435 OF 2025 Between: 1. N VEERA VENI, W/O. SESHAGIRI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. D. NO.10-152/2, THADICHETLAPALEM, SAGARNAGAR, YENDADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TENNETI BHAVAN, ASILMETTA JUNCTION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNIPAL CORPORATION, NORTH ZONE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OPERATIONS, APEPDCL, SAGARNAGAR, GITAM UNIVERSITY POST, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. POTHAMSETTI VENKATA MURALI MOHAN, S/O. POTHAMSETTI SATYANARAYANA, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER BY NAME TAMMINA APPALA RAJU, S/O. TAMMINA SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RIO. DOOR.NO. 2- 2 115, PALAVALASA, METTA MEDA PALEM, ANNADAPURAM MANDALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents nos.2 to 4 in attempting to interfere and demolish the petitioners house vide D.No.10-152/2 in Survey No.153/1, Tatichetlapalem, Sagarnagar, Visakhapatnam District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioners house vide D.No.10-152/2 in Survey No.153/1, Tatichetlapalem, Sagarnagar, Visakhapatnam District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's house vide D.No.10-152/2 in Survey No.153/1, Tatichetlapalem, Sagarnagar, Visakhaptnam District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri K. Srinivas, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Pamarthi Kameswara Rao, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Vijaya Kumar, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, Ld. Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporation. 2. The facts in this case would disclose that the Writ Petitioner herein is the Defendant No.1 in O.S.No.259 of 2022 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bhimunipatnam. The Plaintiff therein has secured an Interim Order of Status quo against all the Defendants including the Writ Petitioner herein. While the private disputes were subsisting between the Unofficial Respondent No.5 (Plaintiff in the suit) and the other Defendants including the Writ Petitioner herein, the present Writ Petition is filed complaining of an apprehension that the Official Respondents are likely to dispossess the Writ Petitioner herein. The Affidavit filed in support of the present Writ Petition does not disclose any adverse activity on the part of the Official Respondents and therefore, this Writ Petition is rather misconceived and is therefore being devoid of any merit. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 23.01.2026 Mnr 4 133 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.36435 OF 2025 Dt: 23.01.2026 Mnr