Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2026 DAILYLAW 2792 (RAJ)
SATYA NARAYAN SON OF RAMSHARAN, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2330/2025 · 2026-04-21
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2792 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2792 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16904] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2330/2025
1. Satya Narayan Son Of Ramsharan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Town Kaman, District Deeg (Raj).
2. Keshri Singh Son Of Ramsharan, R/o Town Kaman, District Deeg (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Represented Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Mahendra Kumar S/o Ramesh Chand, R/o Dhaula Kuwan, Kaman, District Deeg ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sarwat Alam Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 21/04/2026 ;g ;kfpdk /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk dkeka ftyk Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 505@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471] 120 ch Hkk-na-la- dks fujLr djus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh@ ihfMr@vkgrx.k }kjk la;qDr :i ls ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd i{kdkjksa ds chp esa vkilh LoSfPNd lgefr ds vk/kkj ij jkthukek gks pqdk gSA nksuksa i{kksa ds chp lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k gSa] vijk/k t?kU; o xaHkhj izd`fr dk ugha gS] vr% mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o mlds vk/kkj ij lafLFkr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks vikLr fd;k tkosA
[2026:RJ-JP:16904] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2330/2025] fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk fof/k&lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA muds }kjk rF;kRed fjiksVZ izLrqr dh x;h] ftlds lkFk iqfyl ds le{k vfHk;qDrx.k o vkgrx.k@ihfMr@ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr jkthukes dks rLnhd dj izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftls vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA orZeku ekeys esa vijk/k xaHkhj o t?kU; izd`fr dk ugha gSA i{kdkjku~ ds e/; lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k LFkkfir gks pqds gSa] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vuqla/kku vFkok vfHk;kstu dks fujUrj j[ks tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS] vr% ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. 2012(10) SCC 303 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj gksdj mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij ntZ vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk ;kphx.k ds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk dkeka ftyk Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 505@2023 dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Murari Lal Sharma /108