1 CGHC010295312022 2026:CGHC:30710 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6355 of 2022 1 - Sourabh Singh Baghel S/o Late Yadvendra Singh Baghel, Aged About 26 Years R/o Village And Post Mauhar, P.S. Tondi, District Satna (M.P.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Seeds And Agriculture Development Corporation Limited, Beez Bhawan Telibandha Post Revigram Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Manager, Chhattisgarh State Seeds And Agriculture Development Corporation Limited, Beez Bhawan, Telibandha Post Ravinagar Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Deputy General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Seeds And Agriculture Development Corporation Limited, Beez Bhawan, Telibandha Post Ravinagar Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Manager, Chhattisgarh State Seeds And Agriculture Development Corporation Limited, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For petitioner : None appears even in two rounds For State : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, GA For respondent No.2,3 & 4 : Mr. V. Jayant Kumar, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Prakash Tiwari,Adv. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 20.07.2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) : “10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records -2- pertaining to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/ writs /orders directing the respondent authority to consider the case of petitioner for compassionate appointment and to quash the order dated 05.04.2022 (Annexure P/1) 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities for releasing the pension to the petitioner and his family. 10.4 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper according to the facts and circumstances of the case along with the cost of the petitioner.” 2. Mr. Pandey, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State would submit that the petitioner has already been offered compassionate appointment vide order dated 06.10.2023. He would contend that as grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, thus, nothing survives for adjudication in this matter. 3. Recording the statement made by Mr. Pandey, this petition is disposed of as grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive his prayer, if cause of action still subsists. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha