Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27903 (PNJ)

AIYYE KHAN @ AYYE KHAN @ AYE KHAN v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/20838/2026 · 2026-07-09

Sanjay Vashisth

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-20838-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 CRM-M-20838-2026 Decided on : 09.07.2026 Aiyye Khan @ Ayye Khan @ Aye Khan . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. Anmol Partap Singh Mann, Advocate and Mr. Navjot Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Birender Bikram Attrey, Addl. A.G. Haryana Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate for the complainant **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. The instant second petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out FIR No. 103 dated 02.07.2025 registered under Sections 115, 117(2), 117(3), 118(1), 118(2), 126, 191(2), 191(3), 287, 351(3) of BNS at Police Station Nagina, District Nuh. 2. First bail petition i.e. CRM-M-70619-2025 (Annexure P-11) filed by the petitioner was dismissed on 06.03.2026 to await the recording of statement of injured-Afzal. Within four months period, instant petition has been instituted again, and the same is dismissed with the same observations. REENA 2026.07.10 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-20838-2026 3. Copy of the order be forwarded to learned trial Court for compliance in regard to the observations made by this Court twice, regarding recording of statement of Afzal. July 09, 2026 (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE reena Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No REENA 2026.07.10 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh