JAIMANGAL SINGH @ BUTAIYA@ DUTTU @ BUTAI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9450/2026 · 2026-10-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27902 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27902 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:30214 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9450 of 2026
------ Jaimangal Singh @ Butaiya @ Duttu @ Butai, aged about 25 years, Son of Haripal Singh, resident of village –Selaritanr, P.O.+P.S. –Chhipadohar, District –Latehar.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 08.10.2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chhipadohar P.S. Case No.37 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of Chotan Bhuiyan. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and except the confessional statement of the co-accused –Sabita Kumari @ Savita Devi @ Sonu, there is no other material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.18 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 18 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is also submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined in this case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already
been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 05.10.2026 in B.A. No. 9264 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Latehar, in connection with Chhipadohar P.S. Case No.37 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
08.10.2026
Sonu/