CRWP-8068-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (120 ) MANPREET KAUR AND STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Ms. Aarti Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners (through video conferencing) Mr. Apoorv Garg, A MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representa 02.07.2026 before the Superintendent of Police, Ambala (Annexure P raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. She 2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 09.07.2026 MANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Ms. Aarti Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners (through video conferencing) Mr. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4-7 and to take action on their representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representa 02.07.2026 before the Superintendent of Police, Ambala (Annexure P raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. She IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-8068-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.07.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Ms. Aarti Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners AG, Haryana The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the 7 and to take action on their 5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 02.07.2026 before the Superintendent of Police, Ambala (Annexure P-5) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. She AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.10 13:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-8068-2026 further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 Police, Ambala to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana, has advance notice on behalf of the respondents due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 02.0 within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. 09.07.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) her submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 Police, Ambala to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. r. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana, has advance notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security order to protect their life and liberty. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No her submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Ambala to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the r. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana, has advance notice on State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the 7.2026 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.10 13:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.