2026:JHHC:30123 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8255 of 2026 Ayub Ansari, aged about 26 years, son of Gulam Hussain @ Gulam Huseen, resident of Village Pandaniya, P.O. Kushmaha, P.S. Margomunda, Sub-Division Madhupur, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Majumdar, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, APP --- 07/07.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.80 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2), 3(5), 317(2) of BNS and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D), 84(C) of IT Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody since 27.05.2026 and charge sheet has already been submitted. It is submitted that 6 mobile phones, 6 SIM cards and 6 ATM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and 1 victim has been identified to the extent of Rs.1,00,000/-. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit the aforesaid amount of Rs.1,00,000/- as cash security before the learned court without prejudice to his contention at the stage of trial. 5. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel 2026:JHHC:30123 2 for the petitioner is not in dispute. He has submitted that there are numerous crime links. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.80 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall deposit cash security amount of Rs.1,00,000/- before the learned court, which is the alleged defrauded amount linked with the identified victim. The deposit will be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner in the trial. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.10.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:08.10.2026