APHC010711542014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9858/2014 Between: 1. KONDAIAH,, S/O LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O PLOT NO.32, KALYAN NAGAR COLONY, GADDIANNARAM, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, REP: ITS PRL. SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3. SRI DURGA MALLESWARASWAMI VARI DEVASTHANAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP:BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 sought to finalise the Parking Tender for the year 2014-15 in favour of the persons interested by them as Illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the procedure contemplated under the provisions of the Endowments and the Rules made thereunder and consequently direct the respondents to give a fresh notification and finalise the parking tenders for the year 2014-15 after following the procedure for finalization of such tenders IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 12356 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein not to finalise the Parking Tender for the year 2014-15 of the 3rd respondent temple, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V T M PRASAD 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9858/2014 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 06.02.2026 BSP 05 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:9858/2014 06.02.2026 BSP