2026:JHHC:30183 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8535 of 2026 Tamim Ansari, aged about 26 years, S/O- Md Rauf Ansari, R/O Village- Tatakjori, P.O + P.S.- Margomunda, District- Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Shweta Singh, APP --- 06/08.10.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.06.2026 in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 & sections 66B, 66C, 66D and 84(C) of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum Cyber Crime, Spl. Court, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that 02 mobiles and 01 SIM are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, which is standing in the name of another person. He submits that five crime links have been found and a total of Rs. 1,32,398/- is alleged to have been defrauded. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has thereafter submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that he shall deposit aforesaid amount of Rs. 1,32,398/- before the learned court without prejudice to his contentions at the stage of trial as cash security. 6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there are numerous attempts, as recorded in the case diary, to commit offence and it is a case of organized crime. However, other submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 7. During the course of hearing, it transpired that as per the 2026:JHHC:30183 2 confessional statement of the petitioner, the defrauded amount was being withdrawn by one person, namely Altaf Ansari, and the petitioner used to get a portion of the same. 8. To this, learned counsel for the state has submitted that the investigation is still going on. 9. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum Cyber Crime, Spl. Court, Deoghar in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall deposit cash amount of Rs. 1,32,398/- before the learned court, which is the alleged defrauded amount linked with the identified victim. The deposit will be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner in the trial. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 10. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 11. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:08.10.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:08.10.2026