Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27892 (PNJ)

VIKRAM SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/3370/2026 · 2026-07-09

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-3370-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 Vikram Singh and Others ...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. S.S. Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Abhinav Kalia, DAG, Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to decide their representations dated 21.03.2025 and 11.05.2025 (Annexure P-1 and P-3) followed by reminder dated 19.09.2025 (Annexure P-2) qua compensation for their land utilized for construction of Kheri branch Khabra Daroli Minor. 2. As per petition, petitioners are owners of land measuring 90 Kanal 14 Marla and 32 Kanal 0 Marla situated at village Chulli Bagaria, Tehsil Adampur, District Hisar. They claim that respondents took possession of their land nearly 43 years ago without any compensation in return. However, similarly situated landowners whose land was utilized for the same canal project during the same period (1981-1982) were granted relief by this Hon’ble Court in CWP-7224-2012 decided on 09.07.2013 and CWP-10063-2014 decided on 22.05.2014. They preferred PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.07.10 13:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3370-2026 (O&M) -2- representations dated 21.03.2025 and 11.05.2025 followed by a reminder dated 19.09.2025 but to no avail. 3. Learned State counsel submits that the Competent Authority would consider petitioners’ representations and pass an order in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel representing the petitioners agrees to aforesaid arrangement. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to address petitioners’ representations (Annexures P-1 to P-3) in accordance with law. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 09.07.2026 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.07.10 13:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document