Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2789 (JHR)

SANJAY PRASAD BHAGAT v. UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE FINANCE SECRETARY, GOVT OF INDIA

WPC/2148/2026 · 2026-03-30

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9058 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. [Filing] No. 10382 of 2025 ----- Sanjay Prasad Bhagat, S/o Tulsi Prasad Bhagat, R/o Dumarchir Santhali, Amrapara, P.O. & P.S. Dumarchir, District Pakur, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.Union of India, through the Finance Secretary, Government of India, New Delhi 6A, 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, P.O. & P.S. Sansad Marg, New Delhi 2.Reserve Bank of India, through its Governor/ Regional Office, Sansad Marg, P.O. & P.S. Sansad Marg, New Delhi. Office also at 4th Floor RRDA Building Katchery Road, Kutchery Chowk, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, Ranchi, Jharkhand 3.M/s Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company Limited, Registrar Office at Dare House, 2 N.S.C. Bose Road, Parrys, Chennai, and Chowdhury Estate, 55/55/1 Chowringhee Road, 5th Floor, Kolkata 4.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Kolkata, at 2 & 3, Kiran Shankar Ray Rd, P.O. & P.S. B.B.D. Bagh, Kolkata, West Bengal … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : None For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, A.S.G.I. Mr. Sunil Kumar, Sr. P.C. …...... 03/ 30.03.2026: Office is directed to register this case immediately. Later on 2. This case has been registered as W.P. (C) No. 2148 of 2026. W.P. (C) No. 2148 of 2026 3. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. 4. This case has been listed today under the heading for ‘Orders’ to decide on the point of maintainability. 5. I have gone through the writ petition. This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for writ of certiorari to quash and set aside the order dated 23.07.2025 passed by the learned Judge, Bench XI, City Civil Court, Calcutta in Misc. Case Nos.9754/2025, 9756/2025, 9757/2025, 9759/2025 and 9806/2025. 6. Further prayer has been made to restrain the respondents and their agents from taking any steps to seize or take possession of the vehicles mentioned. 7. Considering the prayer made therein in this writ petition, since the petitioner has prayed to quash the order passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Calcutta over which this Court has no jurisdiction and also the consequential prayers which are related to the said case, this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable before this Court. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 30th March, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on /04/2026