THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. PRISM JOHNSON LTD v. H & R JOHNSON TILES WORKERS UNION (R)
WP/53011/2018 · 2026-07-14
Jyoti M
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27886 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27886 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35709 WP No. 53011 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 53011 OF 2018 (L-RES) BETWEEN:
THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S. PRISM JOHNSON LTD., (FORMERLY PRISM CEMENT LTD.,) H & R JOHNSON (INDIA) DIVISION, KUNIGAL-572 126.
TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER-HR & ADMIN MR. P.R.GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANAND K.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
H & R JOHNSON TILES WORKERS UNION (R) ANCHEPALYA KUNIGAL TALUK-572 126 TUMAKURU DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MR.R.RAMACHANDRA.
2.
H & R JOHNSON (INDIA) EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (R) KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA ANCHEPALYA, YELIYUR POST, KUNIGAL TALUK-572 126 TUMAKURU DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MR. K.A.GANGANNA.
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35709 WP No. 53011 of 2018
3.
THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER & CONCILIATION OFFICER, BENGALURU DIVISION-I OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA KARMIKA BHAVANA BENGALURU DAIRY CIRCLE BANNERUGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 029. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.S.NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. G.V.P.REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. K.P.YOGANNA, AGA FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.Anand.K.R., counsel for the petitioner; Sri.V.S.Naik., counsel for respondent No.1; Sri.G.V.P.Reddy., counsel for respondent No.2 and Sri.K.P.Yoganna., Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.3 have appeared in person.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought in the writ petition does not survive for
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35709 WP No. 53011 of 2018
consideration. Counsel, therefore, submits that the petition may be disposed of as does not survive for
consideration. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the same.
The oral submission is placed on record.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as does not survive for consideration.
Because of disposal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 76