Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20482-2026 Date of decision: 09.07.2026 Naveen Kumar and another ....Petitioners
Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Singh Panwar, DAG, Haryana.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)
1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned instructions/guidelines dated 11.04.2026 (Annexure P- 1) and also the impugned action of respondent No.4, whereby, despite number of representations dated 07.05.2026 (Annexure P-5), 25.05.2026 (Annexure P- 6) submitted by petitioner No.1 regarding rectification in the guidelines dated 11.04.2026 issued by respondent No.4 but till date, no action has been taken by respondent No.4 on the said representations regarding redressal of the grievance of the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-6) of the petitioners is decided by respondent No.4 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner.
3. Learned State counsel, appearing on advanced notice, submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued to respondent No.4 for time- bound consideration and decision of the representation of the petitioners by passing a speaking order. NEHA 2026.07.10 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CWP-20482-2026 -2-
4. Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the representation (Annexure P-6) of the petitioners and pass a speaking order, after affording them an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioners. Needless to say, if the petitioners are found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.4.
5.
Disposed of, accordingly.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 09.07.2026 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NEHA 2026.07.10 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh