Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:29602 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9159 of 2026
Dinesh Rai aged about 33 years, S/o Late Rati Ray, R/o Dhanaidih, Khukhra, P.O. and P.S. Khukhra, District Giridih, Jharkhand
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …
… Opp. Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Achinto Sen, APP
---
04/01.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with S.T. Case No. 133 of 2025 arising out of Khukhra P.S. Case No. 27 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 103 & 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge V, Giridih.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier on 19.03.2026 in B.A. No. 579 of
2026. He has referred to para 4 of the said order and has submitted that it was submitted by the learned counsel for the State that the victim was assaulted repeatedly by the petitioner and ultimately, the victim committed suicide. The learned counsel submits that out of 08 witnesses 04 witnesses have already been examined including the Doctor and there is no antemortem injury except the ligature mark on the neck. The learned counsel has submitted that the charge was framed on 23.07.2025 for the alleged offence under Section 108 of BNS. He submits that the next date before the learned court is on
04.12.2026. The learned counsel has submitted that there is no likelihood of tampering with any evidence by the petitioner. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail, however the aforesaid submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner since 08.11.2024, the
( 2026:JHHC:29602 )
2
petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned learned Additional Sessions Judge V, Giridih, in connection with S.T. Case No. 133 of 2025 arising out of Khukhra P.S. Case No. 27 of 2024, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 01.10.2026 Uploaded on 03.10.2026 Binit/