RAM MEHAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/11485/2026 · 2026-07-09
Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27876 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27876 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-11485-2026(O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***
CWP-11485-2026(O&M)
Date of decision : 09.07.2026
Ram Mehar and others
... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present: Mr.Harpal Singh Baidwan, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl.A.G. Haryana
for respondents no.1 to 5.
Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Advocate
for respondent no.6.
VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
1.
This is a Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition etc. for quashing the impugned instructions dated 21.06.2022 (Annexure P-6) and subsequent instruction dated 18.08.2022 (Annexure P-7) issued by respondent no.1.
2.
Learned State counsel has pointed out that the said instructions have already been set aside by the Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 17.03.2023 passed in CWP-27471-2022 titled as
“Subegh singh vs. State of Punjab and others” and other connected writ DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.10 09:37 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment
CWP-11485-2026(O&M) 2
petitions and thus nothing survives in the present case.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the same, the present writ petition be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
4.
Ordered accordingly.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE
(SUBHAS MEHLA)
JUDGE
July 09, 2026. Davinder Kumar
Whether speaking / reasoned
Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No
DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.07.10 09:37 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment