Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27874 (KAR)

GHOUSIA KHANNUM v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/20883/2026 · 2026-07-10

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35317 WP No. 20883 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20883 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: GHOUSIA KHANNUM W/O. C.N.AKMAL, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O. KHAZINAGAR, NEAR ANGEL SCHOOL, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 203. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.S. SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA - 577 201. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, NADAKACHERI, NIDHIGE HOBLI, SHIMOGA TALUK, SHIMOGA - 577 201. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35317 WP No. 20883 of 2026 4. RAJEEV RANJAN SINGH, S/O PUSHKAL SINGH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. NO. 5/102, DEEPAK DELUXE, SAHARA GRACE, JANSKIPURAM, LUCKNOW, UTTER PRADESH - 226 021 5. AYESHA JHULKA, W/O A K MOHAMMED NAWAZ, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O 6TH CROSS, NEHRU NAGAR, SAGARA CITY - 577 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARISH A.S., AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FR STAY AT ANNX-P1 DATED 27/02/2026 FILED UNDER SECTION 136(2) OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 PERTAINING TO THE MR NO. T 15/2024-25 TO AN EXTENT OF 4 ACRES IN SY. NO. 5/2 OF URGADUR VILLAGE, NIDIGE HOBLI, SHIAMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT DATED 10/09/2024 AS PER ANNX-L AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35317 WP No. 20883 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the application made by the petitioner seeking the stay of the order passed by respondent No.3 in PDA No.75/2026. 3. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the appeal, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the application made by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 4. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Pending IAs do not survive for consideration, accordingly, disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40