- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35791 RSA No. 2381 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2381 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SIDDAMMA D/O LATE JAVARAPPA, W/O LATE KAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE, GANDSI, GANDSI HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573 103. 2. MANJULA D/O LATE JAVARAPPA, W/O KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O BACKSIDE OF VISL SOCIETY, JANNAPURA, BHADRAVATHI TOWN, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 201. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.L. SREENIVAS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. NANJAPPA @ RAJU S/O JAVARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/O LAKSHMIPURA, JANATHA HOUSE, GANDSI, GANDSI HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 103. 2. PUTTAMMA SINCE DEAD BY L.R Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35791 RSA No. 2381 of 2018 (a) MANJUNATHA W/O HONNEGOWDA, R/O BASAVA CIRCLE, GANDSI, GANDSI HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 103. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI. JAGADEESH H T, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI G.M.SHARATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2(a)] THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.07.2018 PASSED IN RA.No.69/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.03.2017 PASSED IN O.S.No.328/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Parties are present with their respective advocates. Respondent No.2(a) is also present. They present a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure signed by the parties and their respective advocates. 2. The contents of the compromise petition are read over to the parties. Parties submit that the terms of the compromise - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:35791 RSA No. 2381 of 2018 petition depict the true terms of settlement. They also unequivocally submit that there is no force, coercion or undue influence in reaching out the compromise. 3. Accordingly, there is no impediment for this Court to accept the compromise petition and dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise petition. 4. Hence, the following: ORDER (i) Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. (ii) Office is directed to draw modified decree in terms of the compromise petition appending copy of compromise petition as part of the decree. (iii) Parties to bear their own costs. (iv) Appellants are entitled for the refund of permissible Court Fee. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20