Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27862 (AP)

Vajiboina Mani Krishna Yadhav v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/36696/2025 · 2026-02-18

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010712492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 36696/2025 Between: 1. VAJIBOINA MANI KRISHNA YADHAV,, S/O. SRINU BABU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 7-22-4, GOPAL NAGAR, AMARAVATHI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR ERSTWHILE PALNADU DISTRICT -522020. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. -522237 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR ERSTWHILE PALNADU DISTRICT. -522502 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SATTENAPALLI DIVISION, GUNTUR ERSTWHILE PALNADU DISTRICT. -522403 4. THE TAHSILDAR, AMARAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR ERSTWHILE PALNADU DISTRICT. -522020 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NANILU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 BKM,J W.P.No.36696 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 17.11.2025 submitted to the 4th respondent for mutation of the names of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the land in Sy.No.117/2A1 to an extent of Ac.0.78 cents of Amaravathi Village, Amaravathi Mandal, Guntur erstwhile Palnadu District in contemplating to incorporate the name of the petitioner in respect of the subject property. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner’s representation was addressed by way of an endorsement dated 30.01.2026, which shall be made as part of the Court record. 4. If the petitioner is aggrieved of the same, it is open for the petitioner to assail the same in accordance with law, if so advised. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 BKM,J W.P.No.36696 of 2025 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 19.02.2026 PGT