Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
INCOMP-1575 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 165
TARSEM CHAND STATE OF PUNJAB
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: None.
MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
1.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2.
As per Rule 9, Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it for the purpose of refiling the same within a period of However, as per Registry, the present case has not been taken back for removing objection(s) despite lapse of aforesaid period. In view thereof, the present case is dismissed in default, with liberty to file it afresh after removing the objection(
09.07.2026 Amit Sharma
1575-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision : CHAND
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA None. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V of Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it for the purpose of refiling the same within a period of However, as per Registry, the present case has not been taken back for removing objection(s) despite lapse of aforesaid period. In view thereof, the present case is dismissed in default, with liberty to file it afresh after removing the objection(s) so raised by the Registry.
(MANISHA BATRA)
Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
INCOMP-1575-2026 Date of decision : 09.07.2026
... Petitioner
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. A, Volume V of Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it for the purpose of refiling the same within a period of 40 days. However, as per Registry, the present case has not been taken back for removing objection(s) despite lapse of aforesaid period. In view thereof, the present case is dismissed in default, with liberty to file it afresh after s) so raised by the Registry.
(MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.10 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.