Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2786 (AP)

G KEERTHI CHANDANA v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/14923/2026 · 2026-06-03

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010285642026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 14923/2026 Between: 1. G KEERTHI CHANDANA, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, D/O. GOLLA SANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. D. NO. 4/115, VADDE STREET, ALURU TOWN AND MANDAL, KURNOBI DISTRICT.-518395 2. G. AKHILESH,, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, S/O. G. HANUMANTHU, AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. H. NO. 5-48, VADDE STREET, VODABANDA VILLAGE, YEMMINAGURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. -518360 3. PINGARGI NASREEN BANU,, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, D/O. KASHIM, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. H. NO. 76-111-46-A, BRUNDAVAN NAGAR, KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. -518003 4. K. SUREHDARA,, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, S/O. K. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. D. NO. MIL, GURUJALA VILLAGE, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. -518343 5. MEDAM ROHITHA,, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, S/O. M. MURALI KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. D. NO. 1/2815-135, VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE, YEMMINAGURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.-518360 6. KURUVA CHHIJEERUSHAHA., REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, S/O. NANDAVARAM PEDDA GANESH, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. D. NO. 1-78, B.C. COLONY, NADIKHAIRAWADI VILLAGE, NANDAVARAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.-158345 7. MANGALI MANOJ KUMAR,, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, S/O. MANGALI KOULUTTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. D. NO. 2-462, P KOTAKONDA DEVANAKONDA, PATTIKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. - 518225 8. TEEGADODDI VISHNUVARDAN,, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, S/O. T. BAJARI, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. D. NO. 5-107, DUPPANA GURTHI DEVANAKONDA, PATTIKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. - 518225 9. MALA MITHALI,, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, D/O. M. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. D. NO. 7-11-4, C BELGAL VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. -518462 10. A. ARSHUVARDAN,, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, S/O. A. SANTHARAJU, AGECI ABOUT 12 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. D. NO. 4-58A, KATARUKONDA KRISHNAGIRI KOILAPNDA VILLAGE, KRISHNAGIRI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. -518222 11. P. GEETHA,, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, D/O. P.C. YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, OCC- STUDENT R/O. D. NO. 14/74, SC COLONY, PATTIKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. -518380 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT), THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI.-110001 2. THE DIRECTOR, PM-SHRI JAVAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA, NOIDA UTTAR PRADESH -201301 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.- 518001 4. THE PRINCIPAL, PM-SHRI JAVAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA, BANAVASI, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH.-518360 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in trying to cancel the admissions of the petitioners for session 2026-27 in 6th class is as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violative of article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to admit the petitioners and allow them into the classes and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to provide sufficient opportunity/time to the petitioners for production of transfer certificates (TCs) for admission of 6th class for session 2026-27, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. The Court made the following order: Sri P.Narasimhulu, learned counsel for the petitioners appearing though online, would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and hence, the same is now rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Page 4 of 5 As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated: 04.06.2024 SNI 1 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.14923 of 2026 Dated: 04.06.2024 SNI