Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27848 (PNJ)

MEHAK DHAM v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/20127/2026 · 2026-07-07

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 117 CWP-20127-2026 Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 MEHAK DHAM ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Mandeep Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioner (through Video Conference). Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA , J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent no.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar, to decide the representation dated 20.04.2026, Annexure P-2, submitted by the petitioner and to ensure a fair investigation of case FIR no.159 dated 12.03.2026, registered under Sections 323, 406 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, at Women Police Station Yamuna Nagar, District Yamuna Nagar. 2. Learned State counsel on instructions submits that investigation of the case is complete and challan has already been presented before the competent Court on 30.04.2026 against the petitioner’s husband, namely Kunal Dham-respondent no.4, whereas the remaining accused have been NISHA 2026.07.10 09.56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-20127-2026 -2- found innocent. 3. In view of the aforesaid, no further directions are required to be issued, and the writ petition stands disposed of. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE July 07, 2026 Nisha-1 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable Yes/No NISHA 2026.07.10 09.56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document