Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27848 (CHH)

THE PRINCIPAL , BHILAI VIDYALAYA v. SHRI BUDHRAM

WPL/17/2020 · 2026-07-20

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010045162020 2026:CGHC:30991 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 17 of 2020 1 - The Principal , Bhilai Vidyalaya Sector - 2, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Education Officer Education Department, Bhilai Steel Plant, Russian Complex, Sector - 7, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Executive Officer Bhilai Steel Plant, S A I L, Ispat Bhawan, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners Versus 1 - Shri Budhram S/o Late Chhoturam C/o Smt. Kanchanbala, Advocate, At Rani Avanti Chowk, Tata Line, Kohka, Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Appellate Authority Under The Payment Of Gratuity Act, 1972 And Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Controlling Authority Under The Payment Of Gratuity Act, 1972 And Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Rohan Sharma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Shivang Dubey, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21/07/2026 1. The matter is called twice, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners in the first round as well as in the second round. In these Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.07.21 18:50:23 +0530 2 circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti