PAPPU MANDAL ALIAS PAPPU KUMAR ALIAS PAPPU KUMAR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9161/2026 · 2026-09-30
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27841 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 27841 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:29493 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9161 of 2026
------ Pappu Mandal @ Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Kumar Mandal, aged about 24 years, S/o Hari Mandal, R/o Vill –Kupi (Dola More), P.O. –Amrapahari, P.S. –Ramgarh, District –Dumka, State –Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate
: Mr. Jagat Kr. Soni, Advocate For the State
: Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 30.09.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.37 of 2026 corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 6.25 gram of brown sugar which is also known as heroin and from the co-accused persons taken together, 11.75 gram of brown sugar was recovered which comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 07 of the bail application. It is then submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined so far. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Dumka, in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.37 of 2026 corresponding to N.D.P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
30.09.2026
Sonu/