1 CGHC010268022026 2026:CGHC:30599 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3765 of 2026 Kaanchan Pradhan W/o Navin Pradhan Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Khamhan, Tehsil Pirda (Earlier Pithoura), District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector, Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer, Pithoura Tehsil Pirda, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Tehsil Pirda (Earlier Pithoura), Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 5 - Nityanand Gadatiya S/o Govind R/o Village Patharla, Tehsil Pithoura (Now Pirda At Present), Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandra, Advocate For State : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 20.07.2026 1. By filing the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities for implementation of the order dated 27.06.2025 passed by the Nayab Tehsildar in Revenue Case No. 202506123400018/A-70/Year 2024-2025, whereby the private respondent was directed to be YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.07.21 10:16:09 +0530 2 evicted from the petitioner's land and vacant possession thereof was ordered to be handed over to the petitioner. The petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) :- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for records with regards to case of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to decide the representations of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to evict private respondent from the land owned by petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.4 That, any other relief in the discretion of this Hon'ble Court. Any other relief, which the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances, may also be provided to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the competent Tahsildar/Nayab Tahsildar has already passed the order dated 27.06.2025 directing eviction of the private respondent from the petitioner's land. However, despite the lapse of considerable time, the said order has not been implemented by the concerned authorities. It is further submitted that the petitioner has also submitted an appropriate representation before the concerned Tahsildar seeking execution of the aforesaid order, but no action has been taken thereon. 3 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the petitioner has already approached the concerned Tahsildar by submitting a representation in the last week of June, 2026 seeking implementation of the order dated 27.06.2025. Since the said representation has been filed only recently, this Court is of the view that the petitioner ought to have waited for a reasonable period before invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. 5. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the concerned Tahsildar is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representation/application for execution of the order dated 27.06.2025 expeditiously, strictly in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, and the competent authority shall consider the matter independently in accordance with law, without being influenced by any observation made in this order. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh