2026:JHHC:9194 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4320 of 2022 G. N. Agro Industries Private Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act having its registered office at Room No. 140, Marshall House, 33/1, N.S. Road, Kolkata, West Bengal through one of its Director Arjun Vastrakar, aged about 40 years, son of Late Hisuram Vastrakar, permanent resident of Gadewal Bada, Katipara, Bilaspur, Post Katipara, Police Station Katipara, District Bilaspur, Chattisgarh ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Commissioner, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh officiating from Hazaribagh, Post Hazaribagh, Police Station Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh 3. The Collector and Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad officiating from Dhanbad, Post Dhanbad, Police Station Dhanbad, District Dhanbad 4. The Settlement Officer, Dhanbad officiating from Dhanbad, Post Dhanbad, Police Station Dhanbad, District Dhanbad 5. The Circle Officer Nirsa officiating from Nirsa, Post Nirsa, Police Station Nirsa, District Dhanbad 6. Shhakti Aggrawal, aged about 46 years, son of late Bajrang Prasad Agarwal, resident of 603 Neelam Apartment, Mount Marg Road PO and PS Bandra West, District-Mumbai (Maharashtra) ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhay Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate Md. Faiyaj Alam, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, SC-I Mr. Krishna Kumar Bhatt, AC to SC-I -------- Order No. 10 /Dated: 1st April 2026 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs: “1. ...for issuance of an appropriate writ/Rule/Direction for quashing the order dated 10.05.2022 (Annexure-9) passed by the Collector and Deputy Commissioner in Misc. Case No. 04/2022 whereby the application of the petitioner has been cancelled on the ground that it does not relate to bonafide or material error rather he ought to have filed an application under section 87 of Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, 1908. And for a further direction to the respondents to make necessary correction in recent Revisional Survey and the Old Khata No. 121, 1, 2026:JHHC:9194 2 195, 192, 193 and 63 under Mauza Merah, Thana No. 251, Anchal Nirsa within the District of Dhanbad be recorded in the name of the petitioner and the illegally recorded in New Khata No. 373 in the name of ‘Anabad Bihar Sarkar’ in recent Revisional Survey be deleted. And for any other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled to.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application may be disposed of by giving liberty to this petitioner to approach the Civil Court since there are certain facts which are to be adjudicated. 3. Learned counsel for the State and the intervenor do not have any objection however they submit that they may also be made party in the trial Court in order to adjudicate the issue in proper perspective. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid submission and looking to the prayer made in this application, the instant writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5. It goes without saying that the case was filed in the year 2022 and the same was pending before this Court as such the issue of limitation, if any, may be considered in the background of the fact stated. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 1st April 2026 Amit Uploaded on 04/04/2026