APHC010713382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36485/2025 Between: 1. BOLLU BALA GANGDHAR TILAK, , MALE, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC PVT.EMPLOYEE, S/O. LATE B. VENKATESWARA RAO, C9, JASMINE BLOCK, N.S.K. KUKATPALLY, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (HOME DEPARTMENT), A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU. ELURU DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ELURU RURAL POLICE STATION, ELURU. ELURU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ELURU RURAL POLICE STATION, ELURU. ELURU DISTRICT. 5. MAREEDU PRIYANKA, R/O. HANUMAN NAGAR, ELURU. ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B P RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ, or Writs or order or orders one in the more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents No.l to 4 Colluded with Respondent No.5 interfering with the Civil Disputes calling the petitioner to the police sstation by the Station House Officer, Eluru Rural Police Station, Eluru matter pertaining to Sale of House bearing Door No.3C-7- 17, A-Ward, 17th Division, Block No. 16, T.S.No.l292, situated in Western Street, Eluru. Eluru District as highly 2 illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and clear violation of Principles of Natural Justice and clear violation of Articles 14,19(1),21 and 300 (A) of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents No.l to 4 not to interfere with Civil Disputes and Call the Petitioner to Eluru Rural P.S.” 2. Heard Sri B.P.Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, based on the complaint lodged by the mother of respondent No.5, the petitioner was called to the police station for a preliminary enquiry. It is further submitted that no crime has been registered, as the matter is civil in nature, and the police have never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of by recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:05.01.2026 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.36485 of 2025 Dt.05.01.2026 Asr