- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18645 CRL.P No. 1616 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1616 OF 2025 (439(2)Cr.PC / 483(3)BNSS) BETWEEN: MRS. R SAJANI DUTTA W/O KALLOL DUTTA AGE-35 YEARS NO.4, 2ND FLOOR, SAPTAGIRI RESIDENCY, 1ST CROSS AKHAYA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560065 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VISHNUMURTHY., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA HULIMAVU POLICE STATION REP.BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001 2. MARISWAMY A.G SON OF GUTTHALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.SF-216, MS. ROYAL APARTMENT, 2ND MAIN, 7TH CROSS, NEXT TO MITHRA SCHOOL, BANNERUGHTTA ROAD, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560072 Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18645 CRL.P No. 1616 of 2025 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.WAHEEDA M.M. HCGP FOR R.1 SRI ROSHAN M.C. FOR R.2.) THIS CRL.P FILED UNDER SECTION 439(2) CR.PC (FILED U/S 483(3) BNSS) PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRL.P AND CANCEL THE ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT NO.2 BY THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 17.01.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED LXV ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU CITY IN CRL.MISC.NO.188/2025 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 17.01.2025 in Crl. Misc. No.188/2025 on the file of the LXV Addl City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner therein. 2. Sri Vishnu Murthy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, respondent No.2 is threatening the petitioner with dire consequences to withdraw the complaint and as such, respondent No.2 herein has violated the bail condition No.3 in Crl.Misc No.188/2025 and therefore sought for interference of this Court. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18645 CRL.P No. 1616 of 2025 3. On the other hand, learned counsel representing respondent No.2 submitted that, the Trial Court after considering the material on record, has granted anticipatory bail and as the impugned order is discretionary in nature, the same cannot be interfered with in this petition. 4. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petitioner herein, has filed complaint against the respondent No.2, alleging accusation of the offence punishable under Section 108 of BNS, 2023. In the meanwhile, respondent No.2 herein has filed Crl.Misc.No.188/2025 before the Trial Court under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.5/2025 registered by the petitioner herein, for the offences punishable under Section 108 of BNS, 2023. 5. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and the reasons assigned by the Trial Court with stipulated conditions, it is clear that, the impugned order at Annexure-B is just and proper and does not call for interference in this petition. It is also to be - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18645 CRL.P No. 1616 of 2025 noted that, as to the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner herein that respondent No.2 herein has violated condition No.3 in the anticipatory bail granted to him, the petitioner herein has not produced any acceptable grounds to interfere with the impugned order at Annexure-B and no material is placed as to the violation of condition of bail. 6. Therefore, I am of the view that, as there is no specific accusation against respondent No.2 stating that he has abused and insulted the husband of the complainant before everyone, no interference is called for in this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE AKC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2