[2026:RJ-JP:11604] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3459/2026 Ankit Kumar S/o Ajeet Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Barela Kua, Gadmora Karoli, District Karoli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aditi Meena with Ms. Vaishnavi on behalf of Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 18/03/2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 2. This bail application has been preferred by the accused- petitioner Ankit Kumar S/o Ajeet Singh, aged about 21 years, under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., apprehending his arrest in connection with the FIR bearing No.88/2025 dated 04.09.2025 registered at Police Station Mor, District Tonk for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 324(4), 333 and 303(2) of B.N.S.. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of some small altercation and an FIR has been lodged on 04.09.2025 in respect of an incident occurred on 03.09.2025, in which the complainant named specifically twelve persons, however, the petitioner’s name has not been mentioned in the impugned FIR, and therefore, it is apparent that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. [2026:RJ-JP:11604] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3459/2026] 3. Learned counsel submits that the persons who were named in the FIR, namely, Parmeshwar, Kuldeep, Pradhan and Prahlad Singh, have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 01.12.2025. In view thereof, learned counsel submits that the case of the petitioner stands at a better footing as he has not been named in the FIR, therefore, he be extended the benefit of bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that the present petitioner has not been named in the list of twelve persons specifically named in the FIR. 5. Considering overall peculiar facts and circumstance of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its powers U/s 482 of BNSS and deems it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the accused- petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this bail application filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of accused-petitioner Ankit Kumar S/o Ajeet Singh in connection with FIR bearing No.88/2025 registered at Police Station Mor, District Tonk, he shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned I.O./S.H.O. on the following conditions:- (i) he shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted [2026:RJ-JP:11604] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3459/2026] with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii) he shall not leave India without prior permission of the court. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Dushyant/98