Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27788 (KAR)

SMT KALYANI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/2257/2025 · 2026-07-06

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33819 WP No. 2257 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 2257 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. KALYANI, D/O SHIVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KALIYAMMA TEMPLE STREET, KEELALATHUR VILLAGE, K.V. KUPPAM TALUK, VELLORE DISTRICT, TAMILNADU-635 803. ALSO AT NO. 3534, TROOP LANE CHURCH ROAD, RAMANAGARA, RAMANAGARA DIST.- 562 159. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VENKATESH H N, ADVOCATE) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS POLICE INSPECTOR, CEN CRIME POLICE STATION, CHICKMAGALURU - 577 101. REP BY S.P.P. HIGH COURT BENGALURU. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST PETITIONER, IN CRIME NO. 213/2023 REGISTERED BY Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33819 WP No. 2257 of 2025 CHICKMAGALURU TOWN POLICE STATION, NOW UNDER INVESTIGATION BY CEN CRIME POLICE STATION, CHICKMAGALURU, ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE, SENIOR DIVISION AND CJM, CHICKMAGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE C AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS, PENDING AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES U/S. 420, 409 R/W. SECTION 34 OF IPC AS ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW AND ALSO VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Though the matter is pending before the Court since 2024, office objections are not complied with, despite granting time on nine occasions. 2. Even today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections, reserving liberty to the petitioner to move the matter, once the office objections are complied with, in its entirety. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 122