Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27787 (JHR)

SADDAM ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5493/2026 · 2026-09-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:29475 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5493 of 2026 ------ 1. Saddam Ansari, aged about 33 years, son of Islam Ansari, Resident of Village-Sandmara, P.O.-Sandmara, P.S.-Devdanr, District-Godda, Jharkhand. 2. Amir Ansari, aged about 22 years, son of Charku Ansari, Resident of Village-Taljhari, P.O.-Bara Banjhi, P.S.-Poraiyahat, District- Godda, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 30-09-2026 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Deodanr P.S. Case No.23 of 2026 instituted under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/132/352/351(2)/ 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, assaulted the informant by fist and blows upon the quarrel regarding delay in giving the Form No.6 by the informant who is the BLO as well as an Aanganwaadi Sevika. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner no.1 also instituted Complaint Case No.645 of 2026 in the Court of learned SDJM, Godda against the informant and her husband. It is also submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.5,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda in connection with Deodanr P.S. Case No.23 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 30/09/2026 Abhiraj/