Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27785 (CAL)

CRM(M)/1189/2026

CRM(M)/1189/2026 · 2026-07-14

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.07.2026 Sl. No. DL 477 Court No. 35 ALLOWED Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. CRM (M) 1189 of 2026 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Liluah Police Station case no.227 of 2024 dated 29.04.2024 under Section 376(2)(h) of the Indian penal Code, 1860. -AND- In the matter of : XXX ……Petitioner For the Petitioner : Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee Mrs. Suchismita Chakraborty Mr. Debarnab Adhikary …Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Mr. Sanjib Das …Advocate 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for two years and two months and till date no witness has been examined. 2. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for bail. 3. I have taken into account the statement of the victim girl as well as the medical examination report. 4. Having considered the nature of accusations made against the present petitioner and the report of the medical Page 2 examination, I am of the opinion that the petitioner be released on bail. 5. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 6. As such, the petitioner shall furnish bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Howrah. 7. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court in seisin of the case. The petitioner shall not leave the district of Howrah without prior permission of the concerned Court. 8. With the above observations, CRM(M) 1189 of 2026 is disposed of. 9. Case diary be returned to the learned advocate appearing for the State. 10. All parties shall act on the basis of server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Tirthankar Ghosh, J. )