14.07.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.11 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 2865 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Bakultala Police Station Case No. 139 of 2022 dated 29.05.2022 under Sections 363/366/376(2)(n)/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. And In Re : Mosiullah Sekh ... Petitioner. Mr. Deepak Kumar Prahladka, Ms. Reshmi Khatun, Mr. Samir Mishra ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, APP, Mr. Utsav Dutta ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than four years and till date, out of nine witnesses cited by the prosecution, only two witnesses have been examined. The victim girl and her mother have already been examined. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail. Having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner and there is no possibility of the trial concluding in near future, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 2 Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Mosiullah Sekh shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baruipur, South 24-Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the district of South 24-Parganas without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Additionally, the petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Bakultala Police Station without further orders from the learned Trial Court. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, learned APP along with Mr. Utsav Dutta, learned advocate was directed to appear on behalf of the State. Their appointment may be regularised by the concerned authorities. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 2865 of 2025, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)