Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-8048-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (118 ) DIYA AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Mohan Singh Rana,
Mr. Apoorv Garg, A MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 representation dated 06.07.2026 (Annexure P
2. Notice of motion. 3. Learned State counsel has advance notice of the petition and has placed on record copies of the statements recorded by the respondent No.5 and the petitioner No.2 to the effect that neither any threat has been extended to the petitioners nor she would do s
2026 (O&M)
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP
Date of decision : 09.07.2026 DIYA AND ANOTHER
Versus OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Apoorv Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4-5 and to take action on their representation dated 06.07.2026 (Annexure P-5). Notice of motion. Learned State counsel has advance notice of the petition and has placed on record copies of the statements recorded by the respondent No.5 and the petitioner No.2 to the effect that neither any threat has been extended to the petitioners nor she would do so. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CRWP-8048-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.07.2026
... Petitioners
...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Advocate for the petitioners AG, Haryana The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the 5 and to take action on their 5).
Learned State counsel has advance notice of the petition and has placed on record copies of the statements recorded by the respondent No.5 and the petitioner No.2 to the effect that neither any threat has been o.
AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.10 13:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-8048-2026
4. In view of the fact, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the petition, at this stage. 5. Permitted to do so. 6. Dismissed as withdrawn. 09.07.2026 Amit Sharma
2026 (O&M)
(1) In view of the fact, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the petition, at this stage. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. (MANISHA BATRA)
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No
In view of the fact, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.07.10 13:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.