HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12965 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Kunwar Abhishek, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client intends to apply for dealership. Subsequent to filing the writ petition his client discovered the brochure and other materials, for which she be allowed to withdraw with leave to file afresh. Mr. Gaurav Kumar Chand, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent no. 1 (UOI). Mr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 4 (the oil company). 2. We see from order sheet, the writ petition has not been moved. In the circumstances, the prayer is allowed. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. May 6, 2026 sailesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kunwar Abhishek Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Gaurav Kumar Chand, Rakesh Kumar Gupta (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Satya Veer Singh,J.) Mrs. Hari Sumit Aarya .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad