( 2026:JHHC:29147 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5415 of 2026 ------ Suraj Kumar, aged about 32 years, s/o Umesh Singh, r/o House No. 82, Adityapur Basti, Road No. 27, P.O.-Adityapur, P.S.-R.I.T., Dist.-Seraikella-Kharswan, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup P. Topno, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 28.09.2026 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with R.I.T. P.S. Case No.32 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(1)/109/352 of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder Rohit Kumar. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and in paragraph no.53 of the case diary, it has been mentioned that as per the injury report of M.G.M. Hospital, Jamshedpur, the nature of injury sustained by the victim-Rohit Kumar is simple in nature. It is then submitted that for the selfsame occurrence, from the side of the petitioner, the wife of the petitioner has lodged an FIR basing upon which R.I.T. P.S. Case No.33 of 2026 has been registered. It is also submitted that there was free fight between the parties and the petitioner had no intention to kill anybody. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of two weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Seraikella, in connection with R.I.T. P.S. Case No.32 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 28.09.2026 Gunjan-