Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27776 (JHR)

MUNNI HEMBRAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PAKUR

WPC/3682/2026 · 2026-09-29

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:29196 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3682 of 2026 With I.A. No. 11802 of 2026 1. Munni Hembram, wife of Manoj Soren, resident of Village Rajipur, P.O.- Kotalpokhar, P.S.- Pakur, District- Pakur 2. Gobariyal Hembram, son of Kaper Hansda, resident of Village- Pratappur, P.O.- Deopur, P.S.- Hiranpur, District- Pakur 3. Raska Soren, son of Vablo Soren, resident of village- Dhowandanga, P.O.- Deopur, P.S.- Hiranpur, District- Pakur 4. Dilip Hansdak, son of Joseph Hansdak, resident of Village- Pratappur, P.O.- Deopur, P.S.- Hiranpur, District- Pakur 5. Babudhan Hansda, son of Late Siru Hansda, resident of village- Dhowandanga, P.O.- Deopur, P.S.- Hiranpur, District- Pakur 6. Jadu Soren, son of Lakhiram Soren, resident of Village- Letbari, Bichmahal, P.O. & P.S.- Littipara, District- Pakur 7. Bhagan Soren, son of Kubaraj Soren, resident of village- Dhowandanga, P.O.- Deopur, P.S.- Hiranpur, District- Pakur … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner, Pakur 2. The District Mining Officer, Pakur 3. The Circle Officer, Hiranpur, District- Pakur 4. The Officer-In-Charge, Hiranpur Police Station, District- Pakur 5. M/s. B.M. Stone Works through its partners namely Morphul Haque and Belal Sheikh, both are son of Ali Hussain, residents of Village- Jankinagar, P.O.- Prithvi Nagar, P.S.- Pakur (Muffasil), District- Pakur …. … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Mr. Krishna Shankar, Advocate ---- [ 03/29.09.2026 Mr. Krishna Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that during pendency of the present writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. He further submits that I.A. No. 11802 of 2026 has also been filed on behalf of the petitioners for the said purpose. 2. Considering the said submission of the counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 3. I.A. No. 11802 of 2026 also stands disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) September 29, 2026 Ritesh Uploaded on 29.09.2026