Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27772 (PAT)

Md. Enamul Ejaz v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/6645/2026 · 2026-07-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6645 of 2026 ====================================================== Md. Enamul Ejaz S/o Md. Ejaz Ahmad, Resident of village- Tajpur, P.S.- Tajpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue Old Secretariat, Patna. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Old Secretariat, Patna. 3. The District Collector, Samastipur. 4. District D.C.L.R., Samastipur. 5. The C.O., Tajpur Block, P.S. Tajpur Dist. Samastipur. 6. Mahtab Alam, son of Late Masood Raza, R/O village-Rahimabad, P.S. N.H. Bangra, District- Samastipur. 7. Nuzhat Perween, d/o Late Masood Raza, R/O village Rahimabad, P.S. N.H. Bangra, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Allama Abdul Quadir Jamal Faridi, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kumar Mangalam, AC to SC-24 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 28-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus of any other appropriate writ order or orders and direction, commanding the respondents to mute the land in the name of the petitioner in place of Masood Raza relating to land in question situated at Patna High Court CWJC No.6645 of 2026(3) dt.28-07-2026 2/3 village Rahimbad pertaining the land i.e. Anchal Tajpur, Revenue village Rahimbad khata no. 274, khesra no. 617 area 4.5 decimal; (ii) for issuance of an appropriate writ order/orders and direction commanding the mutate concerned respondents to mutate the land in question in the name of petitioner in place of Masood Raza. The land in question was purchased by the petitioner from Mahatab Alam and Nuzhat Perween and daughter of Late Masood Raza. The land in question is situated at Rahimabad thana no. 76 Anchal Tajpur khata no.274 khesra no. 617, area 4.5 decimal and applied through email for mutation the land in the name of the petitioner in place of Masood Raza; (iii) for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order and direction commanding the respondents to dispose the petition of the petitioner which is pending before the Patna High Court CWJC No.6645 of 2026(3) dt.28-07-2026 3/3 respondent no. 5 for mutation of the land in the name of the petitioner in place of late Masood Raza; (iv) any other relief or reliefs may be granted in favour of the petitioner. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a proper petition shall be preferred before the Circle Officer, Tajpur, Samastipur for mutation as the learned counsel for the State has submitted that no such petition is on record to show his bonafide. 4. This Court shall go by the contention put forward by the learned State counsel and allows the petitioner to file a proper petition before the respondent no.05, the Circle Officer, Tajpur, Samastipur who shall be taking the matter to its logical conclusion, if such petition is preferred in next four weeks. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U