SUKHDEV SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/15163/2026 · 2026-04-23
Subhas Mehla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2777 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2777 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-15163-2026 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 152
CRM-M-15163-2026
Decided on: 23.04.2026 SUKHDEV SINGH AND OTHERS
.....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. H.S. Batth, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Anup Singh, AAG, Punjab. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)
1.
The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S for quashing of impugned order dated 05.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patti, District Tarn Taran whereby cancelation report submitted by the police has been returned to the Investigating Agency for further investigation in case bearing FIR No. 25 dated 07.04.2017 under Sections 332, 186, 323, 224, 225, 440 IPC registered at Police Station Valtoha, District Tarn Taran.
2.
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners limited his prayer that the present FIR was registered in the year 2017 i.e. approximately 08 years ago and the investigation is still going on. The cancellation report was filed before the trial Court but same was returned by the Illaqa Magistrate on the mere ground that the complainant is not satisfied with the police report filed by the State.
3.
In pursuance of advance notice, Mr. Anup Singh, AAG Punjab has put in appearance and submitted that investigation is still pending and the same shall be completed at the earliest.
SONIA PURI 2026.04.28 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-15163-2026 -2-
4.
Keeping in view the limited prayer made on behalf of
learned counsel for the petitioner and submissions made on behalf of
learned counsel for the State, the present petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2 to complete the investigation within a period of two months.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 23.04.2026 Sonia Puri
Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO
Whether Reportable:
YES/NO
SONIA PURI 2026.04.28 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document