2026:JHHC:9077 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2655 of 2026 --------- Abdul Qudus Ansari @ Abdul Kudus Ansari, aged about 52 years, son of Gulam Navi, resident of village Lapanga Basti, Patratu, P.O. and P.S. Patratu, Dist. Ramgarh. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. (Through: V.C.) --------- 02/ 01.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of B.N.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is having no concern or nexus with the alleged occurrence. He was implicated in this case only because he was the employee of the Finance Solution Centre. Further, no amount has been transferred in the account of the present petitioner. Petitioner is an educated person having no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused namely, Ajay Kumar Oraon, having same and similar allegation, has been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.03.2026, passed in B.A. No. 2215 of 2026. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 22.12.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the above, coupled with the fact that co- accused, having same and similar allegations, has been granted bail by 2026:JHHC:9077 2 this Court; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar, in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No. 138 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 1st April, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 02.04.2026