Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 27767 (PNJ)

SAHIL KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/20685/2026 · 2026-07-10

Aman Chaudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CWP-20685-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.07.2026 Sahil Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Deepak Joon, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant petition to submit a detailed representation stating therein the fact that in the application form itself, he had disclosed the dependency of criminal cases against him, so did he during the verification process, specifically mention that two criminal cases stood resolved bases on mutual settlement and quashed as also relying on Annexure P-7 and the judgments, which may be directed to be decided in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made. 2. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents that in case petitioner submits a representation within a period of 2 weeks, the same shall be considered and decided, within a further period of 8 weeks, taking note of the aforesaid submissions, in accordance with law. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 10.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.10 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document